Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/20/21 in Posts
-
1 point
Fensport vs Tuning Developments
Jay Bamrah reacted to AndyK for a post in a topic
Abbey did the complete install, ecutek licence, mapping etc. similar to Martin in terms of cost. Although the Harrop kit had increased in price by the time I ordered so a little more. I had uprated discs, pads and lines fitted at the same time so breaking down labour is a bit tricky as it was all as one. Would recommend speaking to Scott or Mark at Abbey, both very helpful. -
1 pointTrue but if you go through a deep puddle even without a turbo you risk thermal shock cracking the hot exhaust manifold or warping a hot brake disc etc. I’d still rather have the turbo placed lower than higher in the engine bay and be sure to avoid deep puddles.
-
1 point
Fensport vs Tuning Developments
Jay Bamrah reacted to Leeky for a post in a topic
Yes totally thats exactly why I went SC. I didn't want an UEL catless header as I didn’t want to risk failing DB checks on track days. Also keeping two cats stops any worries about MOT’s in the future. I was only aiming for 280bhp, so SC gave me the power bump without increasing noise. -
1 point
Fensport vs Tuning Developments
Jay Bamrah reacted to Church for a post in a topic
TD/Fensport/Abbey .. from what it seems, most have fine experiences with all of these. Obviously i doubt that anyone had for his car FI kits from at least two of these, to have some comparison ground for comparison, and most just say good about & advise their choice. That imho won't make decision any easier, so i'd chime in that you should go with any of them that is more local to you. -
1 point
Fensport vs Tuning Developments
Jay Bamrah reacted to AndyK for a post in a topic
Another vote for Abbey and the Harrop. Have been running since September, has completely transformed the car. I'm running stock manifold, 240whp.