Keethos 842 Report post Posted February 19, 2015 Ooooooooo, oh no he didn't! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mark-in-Stoke 488 Report post Posted February 19, 2015 Oh yes he did. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
smudge 1020 Report post Posted February 19, 2015 I think he's a bit of a bellend Me too if I'm honest Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Quixote 35 Report post Posted February 19, 2015 Interesting part is: The Highways Agency confirmed to MailOnline they pay £150,000 per site to install the equipment and· £25,000 per site per year to maintain the equipment. So we could save money and have more police employed to help prevent real crime by not spending stupid money on cameras... 1 smudge reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
smudge 1020 Report post Posted February 20, 2015 Reckon we should start a petition? Almost everyone on here would share it via forums, facebook, twitter and what-not Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Quixote 35 Report post Posted February 21, 2015 Create one here? http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/ I just checked and there's one here: http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/68499 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
smudge 1020 Report post Posted February 21, 2015 Create one here? http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/ I just checked and there's one here: http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/68499 I meant speed cameras on the motorway in general lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lauren 2259 Report post Posted February 21, 2015 I do wonder, do these petitions ever achieve anything though? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
smudge 1020 Report post Posted February 21, 2015 I do wonder, do these petitions ever achieve anything though? If they get over 100,000 people on board, then they have to be taken to parliament to be discussed. It's then thrown out 9 times out of 10, but the MP's in question always remember that an extra 100,000 votes could win/lose an election Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rob275 1817 Report post Posted February 21, 2015 They would never abolish them. Its too much of a money maker for them. It's a shame they profit off of deaths essentially caused by their "safety cameras" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
