Jump to content

ThatGuyThere

Members
  • Content Count

    271
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by ThatGuyThere


  1. 6 hours ago, Luke said:

    The road noise comes from wafer thin wheel arch liners and hollow chassis chambers that echo the tyre roar into the car. Keeps weight down and improves handling. If you don’t like road noise this car simply won’t be for you.

    After buying mine, the first time it rained heavily I thought my roof was going to cave-in!


  2. Just be as gentle as you can when pulling the bumper off, and hope you're lucky. The tab furthest from the wheel arch seems to be the one that goes because there's very little to it. Mine all looked undamaged visually, but still sagged when re-fitted. I've seen people fit the metal reinforcements and it make next to no difference.

    See how it goes, you'll know as soon as you clip it back in if it's right or not and it shouldn't damage the paint if you then have to put it on and off a few times as you tweak.

    I'd send it to a skilled bodyshop who understand how to manipulate these things, and have them remove it and do whatever is required to make it fit perfectly.


  3. I swapped to the focals and put some sound deadening sheets in the door at the same time. Difference was night and day. I would still like a little more volume occasionally but overall listening to music in the car is enjoyable. Standard head unit. I've got a decent stereo at home and in the past have had a subwoofer in my car. The focals give reasonable bass for what they are.

    Willson I think something is wrong - can you use the stereo settings to isolate one speaker at a time and make sure each is working correctly?

    " just about ok for spoken word radio " - there simply must be something wrong with your setup. This is wildly different to my experience!


  4. 19 hours ago, maurice said:

    While it’s good to inform members that there are issues, that is something of a libellous thread title. I’d change it to something more accurate..

    There's enough evidence - both personal and documented in third-party reviews to justify the claim, further evidenced by TD not bothering to engage, and then lie further about shipping then lie about refunds.


  5. 2 hours ago, McDude said:

    I had no idea such a thing existed. I've just googled it and I'm not sure I could bring myself to use such a tea-cosy. While I said it was like the original Puma, it is nothing like as bad as that; the Billetworkz part is a bit chilly, you'd swear the part on the Puma had active cooling in it. The Puma part was bare aluminium whereas these have a thick paint layer on them so I think that takes the edge off.

    I can still vividly remember how horrendous the puma knob was on frozen days. Loved that car!


  6. It's a cheap car to run as with any other Toyota really, apart from somewhat lower MPG than you may expect (32 from mixed driving). Parts and servicing are cheap.

    As a daily, it's comfortable and reliable and easy to drive. Only potential con would be the speakers are shite - a £130 focal kit is well worth the money.

    Owned mine for 4 years.

    Hmu if you're wanting a red one.


  7. 23 hours ago, DuncanM said:

    It's certainly against the census of opinion, it does everything I want and need out of an engine, and I quite like the sound at 7k. It produces good power between 5-7k, and with the excellent gearbox, is easy to get moving. 

    You also get an engine with very low emissions, that can do 40mpg when needed. That's what makes it excellent to me, it does two jobs, making it a superb daily or only car. 

    Everything is relative. Driving it back to back with a 325ti though, and the engine is so much nicer in the BMW which cost a tenth of the GT86. Same MPG in the real world, sounds  better, smoother, more torque, same BHP. Not that I'm comparing the cars, but the engine in the GT86 remains meh.

×